KE Holdings
KE Holdings ranks joint 18th of 70 in Chinese real estate, with a Visibility score of 8.3 out of 100. This is the first measurement of this ranking, so there is no earlier score to compare. AI recommends it most for innovation and interviews. Vanke leads the ranking, 77.1 points ahead of KE Holdings. Colliers sits 2.1 points above it, and APP 2.0 points below.
Rank by job function
Overall in Chinese real estate: joint 18thKE Holdings is outside the top 10 for every job function in Chinese real estate. Open a job to see who else AI recommends.
- AI's top picksVankeCBREJLL
- AI's top picksLianjiaJLLCBRE
- AI's top picksVankeChina Overseas Land & InvestmentBlackstone
- AI's top picksVankeChina Overseas Land & InvestmentChina State Construction Engineering
- AI's top picksVankeCBREJLL
Score: the share of AI answers that name KE Holdings when candidates in that job ask about employers.
What candidates ask about
KE Holdings is not AI's top pick in Chinese real estate for any topic yet. AI does not recommend KE Holdings at all for leadership, career growth, culture, work-life balance and inclusion.
| Topic | Does AI recommend KE Holdings? | Who AI recommends most | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovation | Yes | Vanke | |
| Leadership | Not mentioned | VankeLongfor Group | |
| Career growth | Not mentioned | VankeCBRECushman & Wakefield | |
| Culture | Not mentioned | Vanke | |
| Work-life balance | Not mentioned | Vanke | |
| Inclusion | Not mentioned | Swire Properties | |
| Interviews | Yes | VankeLongfor Group |
Take control of how AI presents KE Holdings
Visibility is only the start. PerceptionX shows how AI describes KE Holdings next to its rivals, the themes and sources behind it, and exactly what to change to win the candidates you want.
Top five in Chinese real estate
- 1Vanke85.4
- 2Longfor Group60.4
- 3China Resources Land43.8
- 3Poly Developments43.8
- 5JLL33.3
Employers near KE Holdings in Chinese real estate
- 16CapitaLand10.4
- 16Colliers10.4
- 18China State Construction Engineering8.3
- 18GLP8.3
- 21APP6.3
Questions about KE Holdings
What is KE Holdings's reputation as an employer, according to AI?
It is joint 18th of 70 real estate employers in China. AI recommends it most for innovation and interviews.
What does KE Holdings's Visibility score mean?
It is how often AI recommends KE Holdings when job seekers ask about real estate employers in China, out of 100. A higher score means candidates are more likely to hear about KE Holdings when they ask AI where to work.
How does KE Holdings compare to its competitors?
Vanke and Longfor Group are recommended more often overall.
Why are Sentiment and Relevance locked?
They are part of the full picture. This page shows how often AI recommends KE Holdings. Sentiment shows how positively AI describes it, and Relevance shows whether AI recommends it to the people KE Holdings wants to hire.
How can KE Holdings improve its score?
AI learns about employers from what is written about them: careers pages, reviews, press and what employees share. PerceptionX shows which topics and sources are holding an employer back, and what to change first.
How often is KE Holdings's data updated?
Rankings refresh with each new round of AI answers. Each page shows the date its data was updated, and the arrows next to each score show how an employer has moved since the previous measurement.
Does KE Holdings need to be a PerceptionX customer to appear here?
No. Any employer AI recommends often enough appears automatically. Customers get the full picture behind their Visibility score and well beyond it: how positively AI describes them (Sentiment), the themes it links them with, the sources it relies on, custom reports by country and role, and clear steps to improve how candidates see them.
What does the full picture include?
Visibility is one of several metrics. Customers also see Sentiment (how positively AI describes them) and Relevance (whether AI recommends them to the people they hire), the themes AI links them with, the sources AI relies on, custom reports built around their own countries, roles and rivals, and specific recommendations for improving how candidates see them.