CALT
CALT ranks joint 18th of 43 in Chinese aerospace, with a Visibility score of 5.1 out of 100. It was not in this ranking in April 2026, when the list had 32 employers. AI recommends it most for leadership and interviews. AVIC leads the ranking, 61.6 points ahead of CALT. The next employer above it is Rolls-Royce, 2.6 points ahead.
Rank by job function
Overall in Chinese aerospace: joint 18thCALT is outside the top 10 for every job function in Chinese aerospace. Open a job to see who else AI recommends.
- AI's top picksAVICCOMACAirbus
- AI's top picksAVICCOMACChina Aerospace Science and Technology
- AI's top picksAirbusBoeingCOMAC
- AI's top picksAirbusCOMACBoeing
- AI's top picksAVICCOMACAirbus
Score: the share of AI answers that name CALT when candidates in that job ask about employers.
What candidates ask about
CALT is not AI's top pick in Chinese aerospace for any topic yet. AI does not recommend CALT at all for pay, innovation, purpose, hiring process, career growth, culture, work-life balance, inclusion, onboarding and job security.
| Topic | Does AI recommend CALT? | Who AI recommends most | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pay | Not mentioned | AVIC | |
| Innovation | Not mentioned | AVICCOMACCASC+1 more | |
| Leadership | Yes | AVIC | |
| Purpose | Not mentioned | COMACAirbus | |
| Hiring process | Not mentioned | AVICCOMACAirbus+1 more | |
| Career growth | Not mentioned | AVICCOMAC | |
| Culture | Not mentioned | AVICCOMAC | |
| Work-life balance | Not mentioned | Airbus | |
| Inclusion | Not mentioned | Airbus | |
| Interviews | Yes | COMAC | |
| Onboarding | Not mentioned | AirbusBoeingGE Aerospace | |
| Job security | Not mentioned | AVICCOMAC |
Take control of how AI presents CALT
Visibility is only the start. PerceptionX shows how AI describes CALT next to its rivals, the themes and sources behind it, and exactly what to change to win the candidates you want.
Top five in Chinese aerospace
- 1AVIC66.7
- 1COMAC66.7
- 3Airbus51.3
- 4Boeing33.3
- 5GE Aerospace30.8
Employers near CALT in Chinese aerospace
- 17Rolls-Royce7.7
- 18Ameco5.1
- 18China Aerospace Science and Industry5.1
- 18Collins Aerospace5.1
- 22Dassault2.6
Questions about CALT
What is CALT's reputation as an employer, according to AI?
It is joint 18th of 43 aerospace employers in China. AI recommends it most for leadership and interviews.
What does CALT's Visibility score mean?
It is how often AI recommends CALT when job seekers ask about aerospace employers in China, out of 100. A higher score means candidates are more likely to hear about CALT when they ask AI where to work.
How does CALT compare to its competitors?
AVIC and COMAC are recommended more often overall.
Why are Sentiment and Relevance locked?
They are part of the full picture. This page shows how often AI recommends CALT. Sentiment shows how positively AI describes it, and Relevance shows whether AI recommends it to the people CALT wants to hire.
How can CALT improve its score?
AI learns about employers from what is written about them: careers pages, reviews, press and what employees share. PerceptionX shows which topics and sources are holding an employer back, and what to change first.
How often is CALT's data updated?
Rankings refresh with each new round of AI answers. Each page shows the date its data was updated, and the arrows next to each score show how an employer has moved since the previous measurement.
Does CALT need to be a PerceptionX customer to appear here?
No. Any employer AI recommends often enough appears automatically. Customers get the full picture behind their Visibility score and well beyond it: how positively AI describes them (Sentiment), the themes it links them with, the sources it relies on, custom reports by country and role, and clear steps to improve how candidates see them.
What does the full picture include?
Visibility is one of several metrics. Customers also see Sentiment (how positively AI describes them) and Relevance (whether AI recommends them to the people they hire), the themes AI links them with, the sources AI relies on, custom reports built around their own countries, roles and rivals, and specific recommendations for improving how candidates see them.