Australian Signals Directorate

Cybersecurity

Australian Signals Directorate's rank in Australia

🇦🇺 Australia
Book a demo
Recommended by every AI

Australian Signals Directorate ranks joint 15th of 62 in Australian cybersecurity, with a Visibility score of 25.6 out of 100. This is the first measurement of this ranking, so there is no earlier score to compare. AI recommends it most for purpose, job security and pay. PwC leads the ranking, 33.4 points ahead of Australian Signals Directorate. Westpac sits 5.2 points above it, and Check Point Software 2.5 points below.

Data updated:

Visibility25.6Joint 15th of 62 in Australian cybersecurity, 5.2 points behind Westpac
Sentiment Does AI speak well of Australian Signals Directorate?Relevance Does it reach the people Australian Signals Directorate hires?

Rank by job function

Overall in Australian cybersecurity: joint 15th

Australian Signals Directorate is outside the top 10 for every job function in Australian cybersecurity. Open a job to see who else AI recommends.

  1. Software Engineering23%Outside top 10
    AI's top picksPalo Alto NetworksAtlassianMicrosoft
  2. Threat Research26%Outside top 10
    AI's top picksPalo Alto NetworksMicrosoftGoogle
  3. Security Engineering21%Outside top 10
    AI's top picksCommonwealth BankPalo Alto NetworksANZ
  4. Product Management10%Outside top 10
    AI's top picksPalo Alto NetworksMicrosoftFortinet
  5. Sales0%Not named
    AI's top picksPalo Alto NetworksFortinetCrowdStrike

Score: the share of AI answers that name Australian Signals Directorate when candidates in that job ask about employers.

What candidates ask about

Australian Signals Directorate is one of AI's top picks in Australian cybersecurity for pay and purpose. AI does not recommend Australian Signals Directorate at all for leadership, hiring process, culture, work-life balance and inclusion.

TopicDoes AI recommend Australian Signals Directorate?Who AI recommends most
PayYes, a top pickPwCDeloitteKPMG+14 more
InnovationYesPalo Alto NetworksMicrosoft
LeadershipNot mentionedPwCDeloitteKPMG+5 more
PurposeYes, a top pickAustralian Signals Directorate
Hiring processNot mentionedPalo Alto Networks
Career growthYesPwCDeloitteKPMG+3 more
CultureNot mentionedPalo Alto NetworksAccentureTelstra+1 more
Work-life balanceNot mentionedPwCDeloitteKPMG+2 more
InclusionNot mentionedTelstraCommonwealth BankANZ
InterviewsYesPwCDeloitteKPMG+3 more
OnboardingYesPwCDeloitteKPMG+2 more
Job securityYesPwCKPMGAccenture+2 more
Who AI recommends most: the employers in Australian cybersecurity named by the most AIs for that topic.See exactly what AI says about Australian Signals Directorate on each topic

Take control of how AI presents Australian Signals Directorate

Visibility is only the start. PerceptionX shows how AI describes Australian Signals Directorate next to its rivals, the themes and sources behind it, and exactly what to change to win the candidates you want.

Top five in Australian cybersecurity

  1. 1PwC59.0
  2. 2Deloitte56.4
  3. 2KPMG56.4
  4. 2Palo Alto Networks56.4
  5. 5Accenture53.8
See all 62

Employers near Australian Signals Directorate in Australian cybersecurity

  1. 14Westpac30.8
  2. 15Atlassian25.6
  3. 17Check Point Software23.1
  4. 17Cisco23.1
  5. 17CrowdStrike23.1

Read our article: Top cybersecurity companies to work for →

Questions about Australian Signals Directorate

What is Australian Signals Directorate's reputation as an employer, according to AI?

It is joint 15th of 62 cybersecurity employers in Australia. AI recommends it most for purpose, job security and pay.

What does Australian Signals Directorate's Visibility score mean?

It is how often AI recommends Australian Signals Directorate when job seekers ask about cybersecurity employers in Australia, out of 100. A higher score means candidates are more likely to hear about Australian Signals Directorate when they ask AI where to work.

How does Australian Signals Directorate compare to its competitors?

PwC and Deloitte are recommended more often overall.

Why are Sentiment and Relevance locked?

They are part of the full picture. This page shows how often AI recommends Australian Signals Directorate. Sentiment shows how positively AI describes it, and Relevance shows whether AI recommends it to the people Australian Signals Directorate wants to hire.

How can Australian Signals Directorate improve its score?

AI learns about employers from what is written about them: careers pages, reviews, press and what employees share. PerceptionX shows which topics and sources are holding an employer back, and what to change first.

How often is Australian Signals Directorate's data updated?

Rankings refresh with each new round of AI answers. Each page shows the date its data was updated, and the arrows next to each score show how an employer has moved since the previous measurement.

Does Australian Signals Directorate need to be a PerceptionX customer to appear here?

No. Any employer AI recommends often enough appears automatically. Customers get the full picture behind their Visibility score and well beyond it: how positively AI describes them (Sentiment), the themes it links them with, the sources it relies on, custom reports by country and role, and clear steps to improve how candidates see them.

What does the full picture include?

Visibility is one of several metrics. Customers also see Sentiment (how positively AI describes them) and Relevance (whether AI recommends them to the people they hire), the themes AI links them with, the sources AI relies on, custom reports built around their own countries, roles and rivals, and specific recommendations for improving how candidates see them.